Comments on: Southern Columbia looks like the top of Class A

By: paul

paul — Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:39:43 +0000

I think all the boys want to play teams like MCA, Danville etc, the competition is what they want, blowouts against undermanned or down year teams is not a true test of just how good you are. But we don’t make the schedule. it is made for us. Heck if we had to play every team that thinks they are better than us, the season would be 3 games per week for 6 months.

By: Brian

Brian — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:13:12 +0000

you’re being funny and you know it so its not worth my time. So if you want to make a big deal about the way something is said. Maybe you haven’t heard people talk before and state it that way. I’ve heard many coaches in interviews say we like to play the Danvilles and the Mt. Carmels and so on. It’s just a way of speech saying they want to play those calibre type teams. But what you’re doing is taking this discussion off topic over something so little. This will be the last post on this conversation.

By: JiveTurkey

JiveTurkey — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 02:16:41 +0000

So they don’t play multiple teams from different counties? Why did you pluralize all of their names?

By: Brian

Brian — Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:44:11 +0000

jiveturkey, your name says it all, you just wasted your breath on a nonsense post. if you actually have a comment to add to the discussion feel free to state it, otherwise don’t waste our time.

By: JiveTurkey

JiveTurkey — Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:34:05 +0000

Brian, how many teams do they play from Danville, Selinsgrove, Mount Carmel, Loyalsock, and Montoursville each year? I noticed you made each of them plural, so it must be a whole lot. I was curious how many games Southern plays each year? Gotta be some kind of rule about not playing 30-40 games per year.

By: Steve t

Steve t — Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:00:21 +0000

Nick…glad to see you’re so smart. Also great English grammar in that post. In case you missed it, TYLER BOYD IS GONE! If he didn’t go to Clairton, they wouldn’t have a single title. The rest of the team just relied on how good he was. In the 2011 state title game, the rest of the team would have lost to SCA by 3 TDs if Boyd wasn’t on the team.

By: nick

nick — Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:58:27 +0000

The season is young and there is alote of teams that r out there so don’t get too cocky and even with that lost Clairton still will be state champs

By: Steve t

Steve t — Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:37:14 +0000

I agree with you Paul…regardless of who is better, they all can be proud to be able to say they wore a Tiger uniform!

By: Paul S

Paul S — Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:28:14 +0000

Let’s stop comparing this years team to past. Each years team need to be proud if their accomplishments and how well they represented the Tiger reputation. If this year we make it all the way to be the last ones standing, the SCA name will be held just as high as in the past!

By: Steve t

Steve t — Sat, 21 Sep 2013 23:46:00 +0000

Listen…I want to be as non-homer as I can. I’m a southern fan and go every game…I think SCA will go to the title and win just because the rest of the state is weak compared to years past. The Tigers have a solid team, but Becker is no Brad Fegley. Feudale is no Tyler Levan. Hunter is no Matt Moore. And Rarig is no Keith Day. But the state isn’t as good as it was in 2011 and that is why I think the Tigers can be the top dogs this year because the class A level is weaker